A company, holding, fund or community commissioning a technical assessment for the owner.
Product 04In development
Technical insight.Resilient assets.
An expert working with AI will examine the real technical condition of assets and processes. The audit is focused exclusively on the interests of the owner or agreed ownership group.
See risks the owner may not yet know about
The audit will help determine which systems, infrastructure, equipment and processes remain fit for purpose, and where outdated solutions, missed updates or dependencies have accumulated outside the owner’s view. AI will accelerate analysis, while a relevant expert validates the condition and findings and prepares recommendations to strengthen asset security and resilience. The aim is a fast, thorough and complete review within the agreed scope.
Who this product is for
Owners of technology and traditional businessesGroups of companiesPortfolio companiesProduct teamsOrganisations preparing to scale or transact
Owner, board, CTO, CIO, portfolio operations or investment lead.
Technical leadership, infrastructure and security specialists, developers and the audit expert.
Owners and leaders setting priorities for investment, continuity and technology development.
Problem and typical situations
An owner may not know where operations depend on outdated components, undocumented knowledge or untested backups. Technical evidence must be translated into business impact.
When the product becomes useful
- No recent independent technical review
- A product is preparing to scale
- Technical leadership or a supplier is changing
- Incidents or manual workarounds are increasing
- Technical readiness is needed for investment or a transaction
Planned solution scope
01Architecture02Infrastructure03Cybersecurity04Backups05Access management06Dependencies and ageing components07Development process08Code quality09Documentation10Data protection11Third-party suppliers12Continuity13Disaster recovery14Technical debt15Scalability readiness
What the technical audit will cover
The scope will reflect the type of asset and its processes, with an expert whose technical background matches the work.
Systems and dependencies
The technologies supporting the asset, how they interact and critical dependencies on a supplier, individual or component.
Versions, updates and support
The currency of software components, missed updates, support status and technical debt relevant to the owner.
Equipment and infrastructure
Current condition, maintenance, remaining useful life and suitability for business needs across the agreed technical assets.
Security and recovery
Access management, information protection, backups, recovery readiness and other checks relevant to the specific asset.
Processes and documentation
Current instructions, maintenance responsibilities, update procedures, knowledge transfer and incident response.
Risks outside the owner’s view
Gaps between the reported and verified condition, longstanding unresolved issues and weaknesses that may threaten asset operations.
From technical insight to a strengthening plan
- 01
Agree on assets and checks
Define the owner’s objectives, systems and equipment, available material and agreed review methods.
- 02
Analyse with AI
Collect and structure documentation, configurations, version and maintenance records, then identify matters for verification.
- 03
Validate with an expert
Check the risks, fitness of the solutions and their effects on asset security and operational continuity.
- 04
Prepare a modernisation plan
Define what to update, replace, strengthen or organise, in what order and how to verify the outcome.
Data and sources
- Architecture diagrams and technical documentation
- Configurations and component inventory within scope
- Code repositories and development workflows under agreed access
- Incident, backup and recovery evidence
- Interviews with technical teams and suppliers
Planned roles and permissions
- Minimum necessary access
- Separate code, infrastructure and findings permissions
- Secure material transfer
- Evidence capture without exposing secrets
Human or expert involvement
A technical expert will set the method, validate automated findings, assess business impact and confirm the results of a re-check.
What the product does not do
- Does not promise complete security
- Does not guarantee detection of every vulnerability
- Does not change production without separate authorisation
- Does not replace ongoing security and operations
What the owner will receive
A technical condition map
A clear view of systems, infrastructure, equipment, processes and critical dependencies, with evidence and information gaps.
Risks and recommendations
Outdated solutions, missed updates and weaknesses, with an explanation of consequences for the asset and owner.
A security improvement plan
Update and modernisation priorities, next steps, dependencies, responsible people and criteria for verifying completed changes.
Technical decisions in the owner’s interests
The expert will assess the technical condition through asset value preservation, security, operational continuity and the owner’s objectives. Recommendations will help direct attention and resources towards the changes that matter most to the business.
Example outcome
In-depth technical audit
- Technical risk register
- Severity and evidence
- Business impact
- Recommended changes
- Quick fixes
- Long-term plan
- Owners and deadlines
- Re-check outcome
What a first pilot could look like
Pilot scope, timing and format are agreed before launch.
One critical product, service or technical boundary.
Selected architecture, infrastructure and process questions without production changes.
Diagrams, inventory, documents, available evidence and team interviews.
Owner, technical lead, responsible specialists and an independent expert.
Preliminary risk register, evidence gaps and deeper-review priorities.
Findings have verifiable evidence, clear business impact and practical next steps.
Agree the full audit, quick fixes and re-check.
How usefulness can be measured
Criteria are refined with the client before the pilot.
- Critical risks with a plan
- Verified restore capability
- Reduction of critical outdated dependencies
- Quick fixes completed
- Evidence passing re-check
Questions, answered
Who will conduct the technical audit?
An expert with the relevant technical background working with AI. AI will help process material and identify connections, while the expert checks the technical condition and takes responsibility for conclusions and recommendations.
Which assets can be included?
Software systems, infrastructure, equipment and technical processes important to the business. The specific list and required expertise will be agreed with the owner.
Will the audit uncover outdated solutions the owner does not know about?
This is a central focus: finding missed updates, unsupported components, maintenance issues and hidden dependencies. Each finding will include evidence and an explanation of its potential impact.
What will the result include?
The owner will receive a technical condition map, recommendations and a plan for updates and stronger asset and process security. Implementation and validation of changes will be agreed separately.
Does the audit include testing production systems?
Only where the method, boundaries, risk and authorisation are separately agreed. A baseline pilot can start with documents, inventory and safe evidence checks.
How will technical findings be prioritised?
By evidence, likelihood, business impact, remediation effort and dependencies. The owner and technical expert agree the final sequence.
Product 04
Request a preliminary technical-audit assessment Request a preliminary technical-audit assessment
Start with a target group, limited scope and success criteria agreed before launch.